<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	 xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" 
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Safari Crasher</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danielbergey.com/motion/2005/07/safari-crasher/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danielbergey.com/motion/2005/07/safari-crasher/</link>
	<description>Commotion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 18:58:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dbergey</title>
		<link>http://danielbergey.com/motion/2005/07/safari-crasher/comment-page-1/#comment-475</link>
		<dc:creator>dbergey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2005 21:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danielbergey.com/weblog/?p=329#comment-475</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;After I posted that, I realized that the FireFox JavaScript errors weren&#039;t happening with the implementation in my post. They were internal anyway, something having to do with auto-complete. I still havent come up with a way to reliably do it in IE. When I swap fields out on onClick (by cloning the node, modifying the .type, and replacing it), the insertion point placement doesn&#039;t carry over to the new field, thus rendering the field useless. Perhaps I should try using the mysterious IE bubbling?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After I posted that, I realized that the FireFox JavaScript errors weren&#8217;t happening with the implementation in my post. They were internal anyway, something having to do with auto-complete. I still havent come up with a way to reliably do it in IE. When I swap fields out on onClick (by cloning the node, modifying the .type, and replacing it), the insertion point placement doesn&#8217;t carry over to the new field, thus rendering the field useless. Perhaps I should try using the mysterious IE bubbling?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Fowler</title>
		<link>http://danielbergey.com/motion/2005/07/safari-crasher/comment-page-1/#comment-474</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Fowler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2005 21:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danielbergey.com/weblog/?p=329#comment-474</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe Mac OS does something weirder w/ password fields, because I don&#039;t even get any Javascript errors with Firefox 1.0.4. Correct on the IE errors, though.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe Mac OS does something weirder w/ password fields, because I don&#8217;t even get any Javascript errors with Firefox 1.0.4. Correct on the IE errors, though.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

